When  the  20-year-old  Ridinger  returned not before 1719 from his three-year-stay at Baron/Count Metternich as the Brandenburg envoy at the Imperial Diet at Regensburg to Augsburg “all connoisseurs (admired) … his achieved skill and force as well in history as animal pieces” (Thienemann). Should the latters dominate his whole lifework and become commonly to a synonym for himself, so the histories stand for niches of the especially early Ridinger. And yet it is quite authoritatively they which disclose the sociopolitical core of this master, as deliberately or laxly ignored till now, and by that en passant elevate him to an art-historical pedestal of rank.

Three brilliant history coppers are passed on from Ridinger’s (1698-1767) early 20s. Devoted for once to Pharaoh’s destruction in the Red Sea, then in two sheets to the Alexander campaign with the 334 siege and conquest of Halicarnassus and the 331 Tigris crossing. All three engraved and published by third-hands as still not working himself in copper.

They are history pieces of the common kind, worked full of youthful passion in the face of fight and heroism, in the case of Alexander as practically one of same age at his time, just, so in a picture subtext, opposite to the “Heroic Alexander”. In doing so worked quite surely also by a market-participant, whom the Alexander admiration of the time, especially of his Bavarian elector Maximilian II. Emanuel, too, had to be an object of commercial desire.

The drawings to the above-mentioned three Ridinger-coppers are not provable. But then a history drawing of the master from 1723  came up with signature + date along with typical attributes as horse and hounds, which was and is unknown as copper. And was here to be assigned to the Alexander works and here that world historical moment when at the Hyphasis (today Vjâsa; tributary of the River Indus) in the Indian Punjab in the fall of the year 326 BC the king realized that he must return. In the back the mutinous army he consults the incense offering as again and again the last resort for him. And that promised nothing good for him either.

And with this sheer externally now completely unheroic moment Ridinger takes up again the Alexander theme, possibly even wishing to bring it to an end. And shows a king who accepts this hour and therewith accepts the zenith of his own history, too. He subjects the rulers’ vision of the completion of the world empire at the Ganges as lying before him already seizably to the “small-minded” craving of his soldiers for going home to wife and child after eight-year fights, 18000 km on the march, and continuous rain during the last two months.

In his title story “Alexander’s Most Heroic Moment” of “MILITARY HISTORY” (XXI, 2) 2330 years later Peter G. Tsouras will term this scene under military historical aspect “the only defeat Alexander had ever suffered”. Suffered and went through following his greatest triumph against Poros at the Hydaspes few months before, illustrating it with the Ridinger drawing of 1723 here and the words

“ An illustration by Johann Elias Ridinger shows Alexander after the Hydaspes, facing his greatest defeat: being compelled to turn back at the behest of his own weary officers and troops. ”

While after the two conventionally glorifying Alexander sheets above Ridinger now understands the psychological greatness of this moment

and as his quite personal (provisional) artistic result of this unique life he anticipates intellectually widely his own time, the Baroque period. By which at the same time he develops the hitherto existing history picture

An art historic merit for that in literature still the time about 1800 stands with the celebrated picture of the unproven saga of the Byzantine Field Marshal Belisar by Jacques Louis David, soon to become a court painter of the republic, of 1780/81 as crucial experience and starting point of this new image conception. But that is sixty years  after  Ridinger’s Alexander reflection!

How then in the latter the crackling moment of the flowing coat of history is visualized, is not only

a  psychologically  brilliant  masterpiece

by the only 25-year-old standing for just itself – in the same age or so Thomas Mann completes the ‘Buddenbrooks’ as ”establishing his international reputation” (Lennartz 1952), what still one hundred years later Heinz Berggruen let ask for the worldly wisdom and maturity for this, publishes Gottfried Benn with “(Under the Cerebral Cortex)” his first prose text which “he uses later as a quarry, so to speak” (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 8-24-01 + 8-22-03) – , but shows him downright as

a  master  of  modernity .

Whose here only perhaps – Wolf Stubbe terms him finally a “systematic person, a man of intention” appealing to the  reflecting  awareness”^[1] – still rather unconscious inner break with the heroic pathos already in the 30s – published only in 1760! – together with Barthold Heinrich Brockes by equalizing of a furious beast of prey lacerating a donkey with Alexander a verdict of merciless rigor follows :

“ Do  stop ! Your  cruel  image  impresses  also  instructive  reflections  in  my  mind !

Should  be  a  world  conqueror’s  look  not  even  much  more  horrible ?

Calling  forth  even  greater  horror ? and  has  not  to  yield  to  him  the  rage  of  this  beast  in  respect  of  the  innumerable  corpses slaughtered  one  another  by  his  barbarian  word ?

The  hunger  spurs  on  the  leopard ,

but  wantonness  the  Alexander ,

Sheds  that  the  blood  of  a  single  animal , sheds  the  latter  whole  streams  of  blood of  50,000  of  his  own  kind  by  iron  claws  bought  by  him , Come , let  us  see  then  one  day , if  you  can ,

an  image  of  a  Wild  Victor,

Surely , his  look  if  you  find  it  right , takes  precedence  over  this  beast  in  its  lust  of  murder  regarding  rage , wrath , foam , and  horribleness . ”

This sheet belongs to the for the present only 4-sheet cycle of drawings for the “Fights of Killing Animals” assumed by Rolf Biedermann^[2] for the 30s years with verses written by Brockes (d. 1747) and which Ridinger himself transferred into the copper, too, but holding it back for good reason. 1760 finally he filled up the set by four further drawings transferred by his eldest, Martin Elias, and for the publication added by verses in Brockes’ manner.

This addition of that risky original set by four further ones with verses now only à la Brockes and therewith harmless beside the wish for a more comfortable unit of trade quite surely and consciously caused by the purpose to make the brutality of the message of the first four ones less demonstratively. In such a way the enlargement at the same time as a latest outer wrapping. Thinkable besides that the final publishing is due to a good part to Martin’s youthful carelessness.

The reading of the rich subtexts contributed to the first four ones by, as proves here, a congenial thought could, however, have been come a bit to short of old, although, of course, being included in Brockes’ Collected Work. Refrained from Thienemann anyway this shortcoming regards oddly enough even also Wolf Stubbe, namely in respect of his statements made to those four basis sheets, though he dedicates Brockes and his subtexts a sympathetic own paragraph.

Those four core drawings assumed for the 30s and so created only about a decade after the Alexander drawing. But what in the latter evoked with only softly reflecting, the interests of the common man, develops in those first four sheets of the Fights set now to a word-mighty accusation against power-hunger, and therewith war, at the expense of the peoples.

To the already quoted sheet of the leopard (tiger) lacerating a donkey may be added for further illustration that it refers in respect of the decoration with mill-wheel to the domesticated miller-donkey standing in this connection symbolically consequently not only for the duped people, rather representing freedom and welfare of the country in general, which the attempted murder is meant for then likewise.

How far this verbal aggressiveness stands in harmony with the civilizingly so triumphant decision for return at the Hyphasis as thoroughly corresponding with Alexander’s traditional image may be left undecided. Interesting here alone that we come across the same toughness like Ridinger’s death emblematic as likewise definitely too little investigated up to now.

And this force of thoughts not only with the lacerated donkey. For in this connection no less strong in their message the other three sheets, too (The Horse and the Lion / The Aurochs and the Tiger [recte the European bison and the panther] / The Lioness with Cubs attacked by a Bear). Yet, even more, it is the question in context with them, if Ridinger-Brockes with the Donkey-Alexander-Sheet meant generally exclusively the Alexander campaign or if it at the same time not served as a wrapping in the wrapping.

For what at a glance appaers “only” as the damnation of the Alexander campaign, as the unison to the “Alexander the Damned” of the Near East (BBC/NDR/WDR 1998-2000, On the Traces of Alexander the Great), burns up when taking its history to an

oriflamme  of  freedom  and  humanity .

Whom Alexander served as a synonym packed once more in itself. The verdict was meant, at least at the same time, for the own, absolute authorities. Which on their part saw themselves in the succession of Alexander. The old Alexander admiration put forth blossoms at the courts. So like Alexander in 331 put on the clothes of the defeated Persian^[3], so the princes put on in fancy the ones of Alexander. With the result to have the same stripped off again by Ridinger!

For the equation of the furious leopard with Alexander is at the same time and merely in one personified wrapping, unmistakable clearing up of the image in the telescopic sight. Further scenarios are intended for the system as such.

So it is said to “The Horse and the Lion” in succession of the marbel group on the Roman Capitol :

And belligerent-powerful to “The Lioness with Cubs attacked by a Bear” :

And jubilating to the “Aurochs (recte the European bison, Bison europaens Ow.) and the Tiger” :

But not enough with these four oriflammes. For even still in an optically outspokenly delightful and finally so harmoniously touching set as the Fables of the early 40s, on whose stylistic development at least may be pointed out^[4], accompanied separately by verses by Brockes, too, it is said to the posthumously published 20^th regarding the hare escaped from three dogs on a rock where a falcon beats

Or as posthumously likewise including Martin Elias it is said in the subtext to the fatherly

from the 1779 set of the Incidents

But comfortingly to their sheet III

And sometimes that can be the people very quickly, too. So in France only ten years later, some more 210 further years in Leipsic and Berlin. And now and then the robbers tan their’s hide also mutually. As e.g. on the fascinating Berlin oil “Predaceous Animals and Killed Stag”^[5] purchased from old Leipsic family property in 1985 and in its creation brought in connection with the Fights set above.

It surprises how all this should have remained hidden to such an accurate piece-by-piece reviewer as Thienemann. For this group of four, and surely just by chance, but nevertheless strangely enough, just this is identical with the only still four sheets of the set republished by Engelbrecht-Herzberg in 1824 anymore, should be quite elitist with its massive social criticism in the art of its time. Not to be missed then, too, the locations of its authors. Augsburg, governed democratically for a long period already in the Middle Ages, and Hamburg were Imperial Cities! They plainly prove here as vestibules of Liberty Island, whose flame ignited in the “Fights of Killing Animals” burns on there :

The  Statue  of  Liberty  Enlightening  the  World !

Those who have not experienced the dictatorships of the browns and reds in our more recent history may be skeptical against these considerations. But they just have missed those little satisfactions easing everydaylife there, have not heard the vent applause when Schiller’s ”Give freedom of thought” resounded from the stage, jubilated it in Leonore/Fidelio “To freedom, to freedom”! By the way it was just an East German pre-turn movie on Beethoven that emphasized the political rebelliousness of his early years in Vienna to the point one could not and would not go for  his  throat.

Even though baroque artists used to be masters in the wrapping up of such messages^[6] – quoted may be Eduard Beaucamp’s

– , something like that remained and remains highly risky nevertheless! Ten worst years Hohen-Asperg as one knows Schubart (1743-1791) got – reduced to the essential – for his epigram “When Dionys stopped to be a tyrant, Then he became a little schoolmaster”. Duke Charles Eugene of Wurttemberg (1728-1793) as founder of the Karlsschule felt addressed. Its foundation in 1770 happened in the late period of the duke’s excessive regime who promised on his 50^th birthday 1778 his restrain announced from the pulpit.

This well-known example also has indirect reference to Ridinger. For with the sheets Thienemann 288, 326 + 327 later also Charles Eugene is represented in the œuvre, is he independent of the time a classical example of that part of the clients for whom Ridinger-Brockes intended their set of four of the “Fights”. The danger paired with high economical risk at least for Ridinger is obvious. Thienemann, one hundred years later, preferred to ignore such aspects and dedicated to his sovereign with his Ridinger book the image of a good fellow. Not comprehended in his complexity, underrated in his artistry, inadequately honoured in his personality.

In the case of the message of the Fights this reproach is meant for the younger authors Stubbe and Morét,^[8] too. For the ‘harmless’ Ridinger of conventional understandung never has lived.

as Brockes says in advance to the Donkey-Alexander-Sheet.

So the additional fascinating of this group of four of the “Fights” finally is its earliness again. For it stands naturally already in context with the “urge for freedom and humanity of (its) century” (Meyer), the epoch of Storm and Stress of its old and the hour of birth of the new world. But all this determined only the second half

of the century! Then Brockes already had passed away, were his texts and Ridinger’s designs ready since long, being decades ahead of the movements lying in the air. Also a separation of these texts and pictures is out. It was Ridinger who invariably identified himself with these texts still fifteen/twenty years later, so long he has of the century! Then Brockes already had passed away, were his texts and Ridinger’s designs ready since long, being decades ahead of the movements lying in the air. Also a separation of these texts and pictures is out. It held back them. And regarding the Alexander damnation therewith in the age replied to the question of his own youth, which must develop of necessity from the drawing of 1723.

So is not only the social critical earliness of this set fascinating, but at the same time in highest degree its construction. How here on the one hand an old theme, the Alexander campaign, is brought to a close and is set into parallelism with a new one developed from this is, indeed, brilliant.

And let us just doubt if Ridinger was intellectually in unison with his time. For believe we not in coincidences with him! Stubbe, it may be repeated, called him a systematic person and a meditative didactic one … “ holding the spontaneous worker later permanently  under control“!

And out of this constellation more than twohundredfifty years ago he drew together with Brockes the image of a conquerer as it would be quite topically today without the illumined distance of two milleniums. Not without that the own time could recognize itself in this picture. And not without, too, giving the certainty that pride goes before a fall and abuse of power will not be without expiation.